Kahlon

(PC) Driver v. Kahlon

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 7, 20252:25-cv-01287California2,740 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BILLY DRIVER, No. 2:25-cv-1287 CSK P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND DR. KAHLON, et al., FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. As set forth below, it is recommended that this action be summarily dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies prior to filing this complaint, and plaintiff’s requests for injunctive relief be denied without prejudice. I. PLAINTIFF’S ALLEGATIONS In his verified complaint, plaintiff alleges the following. (ECF No. 1.) On April 23, 2025, Dr. Delgadillo interviewed plaintiff in connection with his administrative grievance (“HC 602”) in which plaintiff sought termination of the anti-psychotic drug Haldol because it causes plaintiff to suffer chest pains, heart palpitations, and kidney pain. (Id. at 2.) Dr. Delgadillo told plaintiff his HC 602 was going to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.