(PS) Lawson-King v. Neighbor to Neighbor Homes, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 7, 20252:25-cv-01299California2,121 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JANICE LAWSON-KING, No. 2:25-cv-01299-DC-CKD (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING

NEIGHBOR TO NEIGHBOR HOMES, ORDER LLC, et al., (Doc. No. 3) Defendants. 16 This matter is before the court on Plaintiff Janice Lawson-King’s pro se motion for a temporary restraining order. (Doc. No. 3.) The court does not find it appropriate to set the motion for a hearing pursuant to Local Rule 231(c). For the reasons explained below, the court will deny Plaintiff’s motion. BACKGROUND On May 6, 2025, Plaintiff Janice Lawson-King filed the complaint initiating this action against Defendants Neighbor to Neighbor Homes, LLC; Wells Fargo Bank; and Western Progressive, LLC. (Doc. No. 1.) Plaintiff’s complaint does not clearly articulate the claims Plaintiff seeks to bring against Defendants, but it appears Plaintiff seeks relief related to property 26…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.