Wood

Wood v. Nautilus Insurance Company

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 8, 202524-551California1,636 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MAY 8 2025

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROBERT WOOD, et al., No. 24-293, 24-551

Plaintiffs-Appellants/Cross- D.C. No. 2:17-cv-02393-MMD- Appellees, VCF

v.

MEMORANDUM*

NAUTILUS INSURANCE CO.,

Defendant-Appellee/Cross- Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Miranda M. Du, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted April 7, 2025 San Francisco, California

Before: S.R. THOMAS, PAEZ, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Robert Wood (“Wood”) and Access Medical, LLC appeal, and their insurer,

Nautilus Insurance Company (“Nautilus”), cross appeals, the district court’s

judgment in a diversity insurance coverage action. We have jurisdiction pursuant

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review the district court’s reasonableness finding for

clear error. See Portland Gen. Elec. Co. v. Pac. Indem. Co., 574 F.2d 469, 471

(9th Cir. 1978).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.