Calcut
Calcut v. Paramount Residential Mortgage Group, Inc.
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
MAY 8 2025
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
GEORGE CALCUT; GERI CALCUT No. 24-764
Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 2:22-CV-01215-JJT v.
MEMORANDUM*
PARAMOUNT RESIDENTIAL
MORTGAGE GROUP, INC.; CENLAR
FSB,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona John Joseph Tuchi, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted December 5, 2024 San Francisco, California
Before: COLLINS, VANDYKE, and MENDOZA, Circuit Judges. Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge COLLINS.
George and Geri Calcut had a Veterans Affairs (“VA”) backed loan with
Paramount Residential Mortgage Group (“Paramount”), serviced by Cenlar FSB
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. (“Cenlar”). The loan was in forbearance during the COVID-19 pandemic. The
Calcuts claim that, as the loan came out of forbearance, Defendants violated the Real
Estate Settlement Procedures Act (“RESPA”), 12 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq., and the