Tomko

Tomko v. Batistelli CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 8, 2013E054712California3,378 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 10/8/13 Tomko v. Batistelli CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

PAUL TOMKO,

Plaintiff and Appellant, E054712

v. (Super.Ct.No. RIC10006938)

LEO A. BATISTELLI et al., OPINION

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. John Vineyard, Judge.

Affirmed.

Law Offices of Santiago Rodnunsky & Jones and David G. Jones for Plaintiff and

Appellant.

Law Offices of Michael S. Magnuson and Michael S. Magnuson for Defendants

and Respondents.

1 On April 13, 2010, plaintiff and appellant, Paul Tomko, filed his complaint for

breach of contract, misrepresentation and fraud against defendants and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.