Borrelli

Borrelli v. Scott CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 8, 2013D062904California1,421 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 10/8/13 Borrelli v. Scott CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

RALPH BORRELLI, JR., D062904

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2010-00071060-

CU-BC-CTL)

PAUL SCOTT,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Ronald L.

Styn, Judge. Affirmed.

Joseph C. La Costa for Defendant and Appellant.

Mowbray Law Firm and Rebecca Lack Mowbray for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Defendant Paul Scott (Scott) appeals a judgment apportioning his attorney's fees

and awarding him 30 percent of his total fees. Because the trial court did not abuse its

discretion, we affirm the judgment.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In December 2001,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.