Rogers v. NES Global CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 8, 2025F088374California6,476 words

Opinion

Opinion

Snauffer, J.

Filed 5/8/25 Rogers v. NES Global CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DARRYL ROGERS,

F088374

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. BCV-23-103371) v.

NES GLOBAL, LLC, OPINION Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kern County. Thomas S. Clark, Judge. Jackson Lewis, Dylan B. Carp, Nicky Jatana, Eric J. Gitig and Jing Tong for Defendant and Appellant. Josephson Dunlap and William M. Hogg for Plaintiff and Respondent. -ooOoo- This is an employment related dispute between plaintiff and respondent Darryl Rogers (Rogers) and his former employer defendant and appellant NES Global, LLC (NES). The trial court denied a motion to compel arbitration by NES on two grounds. First, the court found…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.