In re Luis G. CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 8, 2025G063163California2,023 words

Opinion

Opinion

STATEMENT OF FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In the early morning hours of July 4, 2021, Luis2 and Tomas Pantaleon were standing outside the front doors of a 7-Eleven in Santa Ana. 3 The store was in an area known as Krazy Proud Criminals (KPC) territory. Victor C. tried to enter the store. Either Luis or Tomas said, “‘Oh, I recognize him,’” referring to Victor C., who had never seen either of them

1 Subsequent statutory references are to the Penal Code.

2 Luis was later identified from a surveillance video by a detective

who had prior contacts with him. 3 The court found the counts based on this incident not true as to

Luis. We provide this summary by way of background.

2 before. Tomas and Luis attacked Victor C., and he suffered multiple stab wounds. Tomas and Luis left the scene in a white SUV. Victor C. was hospitalized for about a month. At the time of the incident, he wore a Detroit Tigers baseball cap. According to him, the letter “D” on the cap represented not only the baseball team, but Delhi, the neighborhood where he was raised. Delhi was also a street gang with which he had been affiliated, but he denied active gang membership at the time of the incident. He did not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.