Coppel

Coppel v. SeaWorld Parks & Entertainment, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 8, 20253:21-cv-01430California5,966 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FERNANDO COPPEL et al., individually Case No.: 21-cv-1430-RSH-DDL and as a representative of a Putative Class 12 of Participants and Beneficiaries on behalf

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’

of the SWBG, LLC, 401(K) PLAN, f/k/a

MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY

“SEAWORLD PARKS AND APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION

ENTERTAINMENT 401(K) PLAN,”

SETTLEMENT

15 Plaintiffs, [ECF No. 263] 16 v.

SEAWORLD PARKS &

ENTERTAINMENT, INC., et al., Defendants. 20 21 Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs unopposed motion for preliminary approval of class action settlement. ECF No. 263. For the reasons below, Plaintiffs’ motion is granted. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs Fernando Coppel, Pablo Martinez, Tyler Mitchell, Judith Uriostegui, and Elizabeth Usselman (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) are former employees of SeaWorld Parks and Entertainment, Inc. (“SeaWorld”). ECF No. 105 at 1. Plaintiffs are, or were, participants and beneficiaries of a defined contribution…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.