Keir Milan v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
O
2 3 4 5 6
United States District Court Central District of California
11 KEIR MILAN, et al., Case № 2:24-cv-06323-ODW (MARx)
Plaintiffs,
ORDER GRANTING
v.
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO
14 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. et al., DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT [19] Defendants.
16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Keir Milan and Keirco, Inc. bring this putative class action for 19 consumer protection violations and breach of contract against Defendant JPMorgan 20 Chase Bank, N.A. (“Chase”). (First Am. Compl. (“FAC”), ECF No. 18.) Chase now 21 moves to dismiss Milan and Keirco’s First Amended Complaint under Federal Rule of 22 Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b)(6). (Mot. Dismiss (“Motion” or “Mot.”), ECF No. 19.) 23 For the reasons below, the Court GRANTS Chase’s Motion WITH LEAVE TO 24 AMEND.1 25 26
28 1 Having carefully considered the papers filed in connection with the Motion, the Court deemed the matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-15. …