Victor Chey v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

O

JS-

2 3 4 5 6

United States District Court Central District of California

11 VICTOR CHEY et al., Case № 2:24-cv-09175-ODW (KSx)

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS IN PART; DENYING AS

MOOT MOTION TO STRIKE; AND

14 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. et al., REMANDING CASE [17] [19]

15 Defendants.

16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Victor Chey and Timothy Chey, proceeding pro per, initiated this 19 action in state court against Defendants JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. (“Chase Bank”), 20 J.P. Morgan Securities, LLC, David Kim, and Luxie Chey. (Notice Removal 21 (“NOR”) Ex. A (“Compl.”), ECF No. 1-1.) Defendants move to dismiss the 22 Complaint for failure to state a claim and to strike the Complaint pursuant to 23 California’s anti-SLAPP statute, Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 425.16. (Mot. Dismiss 24 (“MTD”), ECF No. 17; Mot. Strike (“MTS”), ECF No. 19.) For the following 25 reasons, the Court GRANTS IN PART Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, DENIES AS 26 MOOT…