Li

Li v. Suo

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 8, 20253:24-cv-05055California2,018 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 YAN-TAO LI, Case No. 24-cv-05055-AMO Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS JIE SUO, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 10 Defendants. 11 12 Defendant Roger Anderson, Trustee of the RWA Trust Dated March 14, 2014 (“Anderson”) moves to dismiss Plaintiff Yan-Tao Li’s amended complaint for failure to state a claim. ECF 10. Anderson’s motion is fully briefed and suitable for decision without oral argument. Accordingly, the May 15, 2025 hearing is hereby VACATED. See Civ. L.R. 7-6. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered the arguments therein, as well as the relevant legal authority, the Court hereby GRANTS Anderson’s motion for the following reasons. I. BACKGROUND In 2016, Defendant Jie Suo helped Li – a resident of China – in the homebuying process, and with her assistance, he purchased a house at 2998 Alves Ranch Road in Pittsburg, California.1 Amended Complaint (“Am. Compl.”) (ECF 8) ¶¶ 14-17. Shortly…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.