Stevens

Stevens v. CDCR Director

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 8, 20253:25-cv-00191California1,039 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Dean M. STEVENS, Case No.: 25-cv-0191-AGS-AHG

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING APPLICATION

v. TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS (ECF 2), DISMISSING

CDCR DIRECTOR, et al.,

COMPLAINT, AND CLOSING CASE

Defendants. 8 After unrepresented state prisoner Dean M. Stevens sued defendants in the wrong district, the case was transferred here. For the reasons below, Stevens’s application to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and his case is dismissed. DISCUSSION Typically, parties instituting a civil action in a United States district court must pay filing fees of $405. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). “An action may proceed despite failure to pay the filing fees only if the party is granted IFP status.” Rodriguez v. Cook, 169 F.3d 1176, 1177 (9th Cir. 1999). Prisoners like Stevens, however, “face an additional hurdle.” Moore v. Maricopa Cnty. Sheriff’s Office, 657 F.3d 890, 892 (9th Cir. 2011). Inmates may 18…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.