Smith v. Farmers Insurance

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 8, 20251:25-cv-00422California540 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CANDACE SMITH, ) Case No.: 1:25-cv-0422 JLT BAM ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER ADOPTING IN FULL THE FINDINGS ) AND RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING THE v. ) ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE, AND ) DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE FARMERS INSURANCE, et al., ) THE CASE ) Defendants. ) (Doc. 4) )

Candace Smith seeks to hold several the defendants—including Farmers Insurance and several individuals—liable for unspecified claims. (See generally Doc. 1.) Because Plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis, the magistrate judge screened Plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). (Doc. 4.) The magistrate judge observed that Plaintiff indicated the basis of the Court’s jurisdiction was “federal question,” but “Plaintiff does not allege any violation arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States upon which relief in this civil action may be premised.” (Doc. 4 at 4.) The magistrate judge…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.