Brar

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TANBEER SINGH BRAR, Case No. 1:25-cv-00527-CDB

Plaintiff, ORDER REQURING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW

CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT

v. BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF SUBJECT

MATTER JURISDICTION

MICROSOFT CORPORATION, (Doc. 1) Defendant. 21-DAY DEADLINE

Plaintiff Tanbeer Singh Brar initiated this action with the filing of a complaint against Defendant Microsoft Corporation on May 5, 2025. (Doc. 1). Background The Court has a duty to consider its own subject matter jurisdiction, regardless of whether the issue is raised by the parties and is required to dismiss an action over which it lacks jurisdiction. See Morongo Bank of Mission Indians v. Cal. State Bd. of Equalization, 858 F.2d 1376, 1380 (9th Cir. 1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). Plaintiff’s allegations are difficult to follow but he appears to assert that, among other things, Defendant “violated data breach and First Amendment” by preventing Plaintiff from…