(PS) Wilt v. Pfizer, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MEGHAN WILT, No. 2:24-cv-02060 TLN CKD PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS PFIZER, INC., Defendant. 16 By order filed March 12, 2025, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and 28 days’ leave to file an amended complaint was granted. (ECF No. 3.) Plaintiff was informed that failure to file either an amended complaint or a notice of voluntary dismissal by the required deadline could result in the imposition of sanctions, including dismissal. (Id. at 5-6.) The 28-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint nor otherwise responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 27 …