Schmit

(PC) Sinclair v. Schmit

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 8, 20252:25-cv-00903California2,734 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALEXANDER SINCLAIR, No. 2:25-cv-0903 CSK P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND DYLAN SCHMIT, et al., FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a county jail inmate proceeding pro se with a civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief is before the Court. As discussed below, plaintiff is granted an extension of time to file the completed application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, along with a certified copy of his inmate trust account statement for the past six months, and it is recommended that plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief be denied without prejudice. I. PLAINTIFF’S ALLEGATIONS Plaintiff’s first claim sets forth a litany of violations, citing Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment violations, racist retaliation, excessive property, sabotage, conspiracy, fraud, kidnap,

Plaintiff objects to the omission of his first named defendant in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.