Bzoskie

(PC) Hicks v. Bzoskie

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 8, 20252:25-cv-01234California1,581 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL JAMES HICKS, No. 2:25-cv-1234 CSK P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND T. BZOSKIE, et al., FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In his original complaint, screened by separate order issued herewith, plaintiff sought an “emergency injunction.” (ECF No. 1 at 9.) To the extent plaintiff seeks preliminary injunctive relief, it is recommended that plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunctive relief be denied without prejudice. I. PLAINTIFF’S ALLEGATIONS Plaintiff is a high risk medical patient, diagnosed with complex cardiovascular disease, has undergone triple bypass surgery, four arterial stents since 2021, and has frequent transient ischemic attack (“TIA”) strokes, and takes nine prescription medications for his heart and hypertension. (ECF No. 1 at 11, 13.) The TIA strokes cause dizziness,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.