People v. Renteria CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 9, 2025F086378California2,690 words

Opinion

Opinion

BACKGROUND

I. Defendant’s crimes and sentencing3

In an amended information filed March 17, 1997, defendant was charged with three counts of robbery (§ 211 [counts 1–3]). As to all counts, the information alleged he personally used a deadly or dangerous weapon (§ 12022, subd. (b)); was previously convicted of robbery, which qualified as a strike under the Three Strikes law (§ 1170.12, subd. (c)(1)) and a serious felony (§ 667, subd. (a)); and served a prison term following the earlier conviction (§ 667.5, former subd. (b)). On March 31, 1997, defendant pled guilty to the count 1 charge and no contest to the remaining charges and special allegations. The sentencing court imposed a 15-year prison term: (1) the middle term of three years doubled to six years plus five years for the prior serious felony enhancement

1 Unless otherwise indicated, subsequent statutory citations refer to the Penal Code. 2 Section 667.5, former subdivision (b) allowed the sentence enhancement “for each prior separate prison term served for any felony . . . .” (Stats. 1997, ch. 371, § 1, p. 2538.) Therefore, in this opinion, we may refer to an enhancement under the former and current statute as a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.