Saenz

Saenz v. Eurostar CA2/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 9, 2025B333851California2,632 words

Opinion

Opinion

Moor, J.

Filed 5/9/25 Saenz v. Eurostar CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

JUDDY SAENZ, B333851

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. v. 22STCV39723)

EUROSTAR, INC.,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Theresa Traber, Judge. Affirmed. Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, Andrew L. Satenberg, Ryan P. Patterson and Benjamin G. Shatz for Defendant and Appellant. Bartz Law Group and Aaron A. Bartz for Plaintiff and Respondent. ________________________ Defendant and appellant Eurostar, Inc., (Eurostar) appeals from an order denying a motion to compel arbitration entered in favor…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.