Myles

Myles v. County of San Diego

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 12, 202523-3198California2,615 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 12 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICKAIL MYLES, an individual, Nos. 23-55487 23-3198 Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. D.C. No. 3:15-cv-01985-JAH-BLM COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, by and through the San Diego Sheriff's Department, a public entity; J. BANKS, Deputy, an individual, MEMORANDUM*

Defendants-Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California John A. Houston, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted January 15, 2025 Pasadena, California

Before: GOULD, FRIEDLAND, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

Defendants-Appellants the County of San Diego and officer Jeremy Banks

appeal from the district court’s denial of their post-trial motions after a jury found

them liable for violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Monell,1 the Bane Act, and for

negligence. The district court denied Defendants’ motions for qualified immunity

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.