Cleveland v. The Behemoth

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 9, 20253:19-cv-00672California3,328 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 ROBERT CLEVELAND, an individual, Case No.: 3:19-cv-00672-RBM-BGS

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF

ROBERT CLEVELAND’S MOTION

THE BEHEMOTH, a California

TO RETAX COSTS

corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, 13 Defendants. 14 [Doc. 185] 15 16 Presently before the Court are the order and mandate of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. (Docs. 196, 197.) After a jury rendered a verdict in favor of Defendant The Behemoth (“Defendant”) (Doc. 168) and the Clerk of the Court taxed $49,860.91 in costs in favor of Defendant (Doc. 184 at 5), Plaintiff Robert Cleveland (“Plaintiff”) filed a Motion to Retax Costs (“Retax Motion”). (Doc. 185.) On May 11, 2023, this Court issued an Order Denying Plaintiff’s Motion to Retax Costs (“Retax Order”). (Doc. 189.) Plaintiff appealed. (Doc. 190.) On May 2, 2024, the Ninth Circuit vacated the Court’s denial of the Retax Motion and remanded the case for 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.