Bhatia

Bhatia v. Silvergate Bank

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 12, 20253:23-cv-01406California823 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 IN RE: SILVERGATE CAPITAL Case No.: 3:23-cv-01406-RBM-BLM

CORPORATION

ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO

FILE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING

ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY

APPROVAL

15 [Doc. 66] 16 17 Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Settlement Approval (“Preliminary Approval Motion”). (Doc. 66.) In their Preliminary Approval Motion Plaintiffs request that this Court grant preliminary approval of the proposed settlement and defer its approval of the notice and allocation plans, including the separate notice required under the Class Action Fairness Act (“CAFA”). (Id. at 30–33.) Having reviewed the submissions, the Court finds that additional briefing is warranted. Preliminary approval is appropriate when “the court will likely be able to” grant final approval under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 23(e). Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(e)(1)(B). When parties seek approval of a class settlement before class certification, 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.