Phipher

(HC) Estrada v. Phipher

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 12, 20251:22-cv-01090California3,375 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMIE ESTRADA, Case No. 1:22-cv-1090-DC-JDP (P) Petitioner, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS PHIPHER, Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner Jamie Estrada, a state prisoner proceeding without counsel, seeks a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, contending that (1) the resentencing court violated his due process rights by failing to advise him of his right to appeal his resentencing; (2) his resentencing counsel was ineffective for failing to advise him of the same; and (3) his appellate resentencing counsel was ineffective for failing to bring up certain issues on appeal. ECF No. 1. Respondents have filed an answer, ECF No. 17, and petitioner has filed a traverse, ECF No. 19. After reviewing the pleadings and state court records, I recommend that the petition be denied. Background In 1995, petitioner was convicted of second-degree murder and two counts of carjacking, and he was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.