(SS) Vertner v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 9, 20251:24-cv-00454California5,573 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANGELL VERTNER, Case No. 1:24-cv-00454-HBK Plaintiff, ORDER REMANDING CASE TO

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY1

v. (Doc. Nos. 12, 18) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

15 Defendant. 16 17 18 Angell Vertner (“Plaintiff”) seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denying her application for supplemental security income under the Social Security Act. (Doc. No. 1). The matter is currently before the Court on the parties’ briefs, which were submitted without oral argument. (Doc. Nos. 12, 18-19). For the reasons stated, the Court orders this matter remanded for further administrative proceedings. I. JURISDICTION Plaintiff filed for supplemental security income on July 20, 2021, alleging an onset date of

1 Both parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §636(c)(1). (Doc. No. 10). 28 June 15, 2021. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.