Saranay Sonny Ballungay v. Ricoh USA, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 9, 20252:24-cv-10839California1,926 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

JS-6 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SARANAY “SONNY” BALLUNGAY, C ase No.: 2:24-cv-10839-SRM-ASx

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

RICOH USA, INC., and DOES 1 through MOTION FOR REMAND, DKT. [10]

50,

Defendants.

17 18 I. INTRODUCTION Before the Court is Plaintiff Saranay “Sonny” Ballungay’s Motion for Remand. (Dkt. 10, Mot.) Defendant Ricoh USA, Inc. opposes. (Dkt. 12, Opp’n.) The Court finds this matter appropriate for resolution without a hearing. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); C.D. Cal. R. 78-1. The hearing set for July 17, 2025, is VACATED. Having considered the parties’ arguments, relevant legal authority, and record in this case, the Motion for Remand is GRANTED. II. BACKGROUND This is a single-plaintiff employment case arising out of allegations that Ricoh wrongfully terminated Ballungay’s employment. Ballungay, a California resident, worked as a Service Technician for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.