(PC)Jackson

(PC)Jackson v. Pouge

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 12, 20251:24-cv-01027California3,601 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CORNEL JACKSON, Case No. 1:24-cv-1027-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT

v. JUDGE TYSON POUGE, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DISMISS ACTION FOR FAILURE TO

Defendants. STATE A CLAIM (ECF No. 9) FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 18 Plaintiff Cornel Jackson (“Plaintiff”) is a pretrial detainee proceeding pro se and in forma 19 pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court screened Plaintiff’s 20 complaint, and Plaintiff was granted leave to amend. Plaintiff’s first amended complaint is 21 currently before the Court for screening. (ECF No. 9.)

I. Screening Requirement and Standard

23 The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a 24 governmental entity and/or against an officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. 25 § 1915A(a). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.