Eftekari

Eftekari v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 9, 20253:24-cv-02274California1,404 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 BIJAN EFTEKARI, Case No.: 24-CV-2274 JLS (KSC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION TO DISMISS

COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO CIVIL

SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, LOCAL RULE 7.1(f)(3)(c) INC., et al., 14 Defendants. (ECF No. 14) 15 Presently before the Court are Defendants Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. and Citibank, N.A.’s Motion to Dismiss Complaint (“Mot.,” ECF No. 14) and Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof (“Mem.,” ECF No. 14-1). Plaintiff has not opposed the Motion despite the requirements of Civil Local Rule 7.1(e)(2). For the reasons that follow, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ Motion pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(f)(3)(c). / / / / / / / / / / / / 26 27 28 1 Defendants also filed a Request for Judicial Notice, see ECF No. 14-2, but given the Court’s resolution BACKGROUND In August 2022, Plaintiff obtained a home mortgage loan…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.