Rama

Williams v. Rama

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 12, 20251:25-cv-00232California2,450 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 AHKEEM WILLIAMS, Case No. 1:25-cv-00232-KES-SAB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER SCREENING FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND GRANTING LEAVE TO v. FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 14 RASAEI RAMA, et al., (ECF No. 9) 15 Defendants. THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE 16 On February 21, 2025, Plaintiff Ahkeem Williams, who is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a complaint against Rasaei Rama and Kaweah Health Mental Health. (ECF No. 1.) Following administrative filings not relevant here, on March 7, 2025, the Court granted Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis and on March 27, 2025, screened the complaint, found it failed to state a claim, and gave Plaintiff 30 days in which to file an amended complaint. (ECF Nos. 7, 8.) Plaintiff timely filed a first amended complaint (ECF No. 9), and the Court now undertakes screening of the amended complaint. I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT The in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.