Machado

Machado v. Boyd

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 9, 20254:24-cv-03525California6,311 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ENMANUEL ISAIAS ERAZO Case No. 4:24-cv-03525-KAW

MACHADO,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' Plaintiff, MOTION TO DISMISS THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT v. Re: Dkt. No. 27 DANIEL BOYD, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 On December 12, 2024, Defendants Daniel Boyd, Rony Flores, Prince Nagi, and Uriel Vazquez filed a motion to dismiss the second amended complaint. (Defs.’ Mot., Dkt. No. 27.) On February 6, 2025, the Court held a hearing, and, for the reasons set forth below, GRANTS the motion to dismiss without leave to amend because any amendment would be futile. I. BACKGROUND On June 11, 2024, Plaintiff Enmanuel Isaías Erazo Machado filed a lawsuit alleging civil rights violations against Defendant Petaluma Police Department and Petaluma Police Officers Daniel Boyd, Prince Nagi, Rony Flores, and Uriel Vazquez. (Dkt. No. 1.) In September 2021,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.