Redick III v. County of Tuolumne
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 STANLEY E. REDICK, III, Case No. 1:25-cv-00453-KES-EPG Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,
RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S (1)
v. MOTION TO STRIKE AND (2) MOTION
FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT BE DENIED
13 COUNTY OF TUOLUMNE, et al., (ECF Nos. 15, 16) 14 Defendants. OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN
THIRTY (30) DAYS
17 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Stanley E. Redick, III proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF Nos. 1, 14). Plaintiff’s complaint, filed on March 21, 2025, generally challenges Defendants’ alleged misconduct regarding his state court proceedings. (ECF No. 1). On May 6, 2025, the Court issued a screening order, concluding that Plaintiff failed to state any cognizable claims and giving him leave to file an amended complaint or stand on his complaint. (ECF No. 17). Among other things, the screening order discussed the Younger abstention…