Dina Hassan v. Rentokil North America Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 9, 20255:25-cv-00985California1,602 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

JS-6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DINA HASSAN, ) Case No. ED CV 25-0985 FMO (SHKx) Plaintiff, V. ORDER REMANDING ACTION RENTOKIL NORTH AMERICA INC., et a Defendants. ) ) On February 21, 2025, Dina Hassan (“plaintiff”) filed a Complaint in the San Bernardino 18 County Superior Court against Rentokil North America, Inc. DBA Western Exterminator Company 19] (“Rentokil”) and Virginia Suarez (“Suarez”) (collectively, “defendants”) asserting state law claims 20] relating to her employment. (See Dkt. 1, Notice of Removal (“NOR”) at J] 3-4); (Dkt. 1-5, Exh. 21] A, Compl. at Jf] & 27-85). On April 22, 2025, Rentokil removed the action on diversity 22 || jurisdiction grounds pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332(a) and 1441(b). (See Dkt. 1, NOR at 1). 23 || Having reviewed the pleadings, the court hereby remands this action to state…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.