Shaw
Shaw v. Macomber
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 8, 20253:25-cv-00089California4,106 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES D. SHAW, Case No.: 3:25-cv-0089-RBM-MSB
CDCR #G05862,
ORDER:
Plaintiff, 13 vs. (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO PROCEED IN
FORMA PAUPERIS [Doc. 2];
16 (2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT
JEFF MACOMBER, JAMES HILL, DR.
ON SCREENING PURSUANT TO
SANTO, Y. SATO,
28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) AND Defendants. 1915A(b) [Doc. 1]; and 19 (3) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION [Doc. 3] 22 Plaintiff James E. Shaw (“Plaintiff”), an inmate proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Complaint”) (Doc. 1), along with a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP Motion”) (Doc. 2), and a Motion for Preliminary Injunction Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65 (Doc. 3). In his Complaint, Plaintiff alleges Defendants Jeff Macomber, James Hill, Santo, and Sato (collectively, 28 …