Shaw

Shaw v. Macomber

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 8, 20253:25-cv-00089California4,106 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES D. SHAW, Case No.: 3:25-cv-0089-RBM-MSB

CDCR #G05862,

ORDER:

Plaintiff, 13 vs. (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO PROCEED IN

FORMA PAUPERIS [Doc. 2];

16 (2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT

JEFF MACOMBER, JAMES HILL, DR.

ON SCREENING PURSUANT TO

SANTO, Y. SATO,

28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) AND Defendants. 1915A(b) [Doc. 1]; and 19 (3) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY

INJUNCTION [Doc. 3] 22 Plaintiff James E. Shaw (“Plaintiff”), an inmate proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Complaint”) (Doc. 1), along with a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP Motion”) (Doc. 2), and a Motion for Preliminary Injunction Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65 (Doc. 3). In his Complaint, Plaintiff alleges Defendants Jeff Macomber, James Hill, Santo, and Sato (collectively, 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.