Harris

Harris v. Santos

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 9, 20253:25-cv-00284California834 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID D. HARRIS, CDCR #P-54352, Case No.: 25-CV-284 JLS (DDL)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT

v. PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

DR. MICHAEL SANTOS,

OR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING

Defendant. ORDER

16 (ECF No. 8) 17 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff David D. Harris’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction or Temporary Restraining Order (“Mot.,” ECF No. 8). Having carefully considered Plaintiff’s filings and the applicable law, the Court DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff’s Motion. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(b) governs the issuance of a temporary restraining order (“TRO”). The standard for a TRO is identical to the standard for a preliminary injunction. Frontline Med. Assocs., Inc. v. Coventry Healthcare Worker’s Comp., Inc., 620 F. Supp. 2d 1109, 1110 (C.D. Cal. 2009). A plaintiff seeking preliminary relief must establish “[1] that he is likely to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.