Hodroff
Hodroff v. JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Matthew HODROFF, Case No.: 25-cv-0041-AGS-JLB
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART
v. DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO
DISMISS (ECF 7)
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, et al.,
Defendants.
Plaintiff Matthew Hodroff, an attorney representing himself, brings this action against defendants JPMorgan Chase Bank and its “National Association.” (ECF 1, at 17.) But his sole federal claim is time-barred. So, unless he files an amended complaint, his remaining claims will be remanded to state court. In 2017, Hodroff “allegedly became indebted on” accounts “owned by Defendants.” (ECF 1, at 22.) According to the complaint, defendants then “persisted in a coordinated attack” “to annoy harass, deceive, and trick [him] into paying for” “disputed” debts. (Id. at 23.) They “continue to claim and report late payments, despite no payments being due,” and Hodroff “has suffered economic damages” because they are “publishing false and misleading…