Jose Osvaldo Arteaga v. Pedro A. Castellanos

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMay 6, 20252:21-cv-08827California807 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 JOSE OSVALDO ARTEAGA, Case No. 2:21-08827 DDP (ADS)

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER ACCEPTING UNITED STATES

MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND

PEDRO A. CASTELLANOS, et al., RECOMMENDATION

Defendants.

16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Complaint, [Dkt. No. 23], Defendants Pedro A. Castellanos, Carlos Flores, and Erika Rios’s (“Defendants”) Motion for Summary Judgment, [Dkt. No. 88], Plaintiff’s Opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment, [Dkt. No. 102], the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (“Initial Report”), [Dkt. No. 109], and the Amended and Supplemental Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (“Amended Report”) [Dkt. No. 112]. The Court has also reviewed Defendants’ Objections to the Report and Recommendation (“First Objections”) [Dkt. No. 110], as well as Defendants’ Reply to Objection to Report and Recommendation (“Second…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.