San Francisco Baykeeper v. Sunnyvale
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 SAN FRANCISCO BAYKEEPER, Case No. 5:20-cv-00824-EJD
Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION
v.
CITY OF SUNNYVALE, et al., Re: ECF No. 278 Defendants.
Two months ago, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in City and County of San Francisco v. EPA (“CCSF”), 145 S. Ct. 704 (2025). There, the Supreme Court held that discharge permits issued under the Clean Water Act, which regulate pollutant discharges into certain bodies of water, cannot contain “end-result” limitations. According to Defendants—the Cities of Sunnyvale and Mountain View—the permit limitations they are being accused of violating in this matter are precisely such unallowable end-result limitations. As such, the Cities now move for reconsideration of several of the Court’s prior orders granting relief against the Cities. After reviewing the submissions on this issue, the Court finds oral argument to be unnecessary under…