Bell v. Oama Coronado LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL BELL, et al., Case No.: 25-cv-01170-CAB-DEB

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. PROCEED IFP AND DISMISSING

COMPLAINT AND MOTION

OAMA CORONADO LLC, et al.,

Defendants. [Doc. Nos. 1–3] 16 On May 7, 2025, Plaintiffs Michael Bell and Lisa Philips filed a complaint against Defendants Oama Coronado LLC, Todd Brisco & Associates, Valerie Sparks, Judge Peter F. Murray, and Sirein Roman. [Doc. No. 1.] Plaintiffs did not prepay the civil filing fees required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) at the time of filing; instead, they filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). [Doc. No. 2.] Plaintiffs also filed a motion to stay ongoing Superior Court proceedings. [Doc. No. 3.] For the reasons outlined below, the IFP motion is granted, and the Plaintiffs’ complaint and motion to stay are dismissed. I. Motion to Proceed IFP Generally, all parties…