IN RE CIM-SQ TRANSFER CASES

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 12, 20255:20-cv-06326California3,017 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION IN RE CIM-SQ TRANSFER CASES Case No. 5:20-cv-06326-EJD

ORDER REOPENING CASE;

This Document Relates To: VACATING JUDGMENT;

OF SERVICE

10 24-cv-03569; Moralez v. State of California Dkt. No. 215 et al. 12 INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, a California prisoner, filed this pro se complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Dkt. No. 1 in 24-cv-03569. Plaintiff alleged that defendants violated his constitutional rights by transferring over 100 inmates, some of whom were infected with COVID-19, from the California Institution for Men (CIM) to San Quentin State Prison (SQSP)1 in May 2020. The Court previously dismissed plaintiff’s action for failing to file an application to proceed in forma pauperis or to pay the correct filing fee. See Dkt. No. 8 in 24-cv-03569. Plaintiff has filed a motion to reopen the case, accompanied by an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Dkt. Nos. 215, 216 in Case No. 20-cv-06326. Plaintiff’s motion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.