Ledwidge
Ledwidge v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 NIALL LEDWIDGE, et al., Case No. 5:24-cv-08352-BLF
Plaintiffs,
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
v. MOTION FOR A STAY OF
DISCOVERY
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, et al., [Re: Dkt. No. 45] 11 Defendants. 12 Before the Court is Defendants Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and Martin J. Gruenberg’s (collectively, “Defendants”) second motion to stay discovery, Dkt. No. 45 (“Mot.”), this time pending the resolution of their motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint. Plaintiffs oppose the motion, Dkt. No. 53 (“Opp.”), and Defendants filed a reply in support of the motion, Dkt. No. 54 (“Reply”). The Court finds this motion suitable for disposition without oral argument, Civ. L.R. 7-1(b), and GRANTS Defendants’ request for a further stay of discovery pending resolution of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 51). A district court has “wide discretion in…