Hill

(PC) Moore v. Hill

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 12, 20252:22-cv-00758California619 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SIDNI ALFRED MOORE, No. 2:22-cv-0758 DC AC P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS HILL, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a former state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court are defendants’ motions to revoke in forma pauperis status and to dismiss. ECF Nos. 39, 40. On March 11, 2025, plaintiff was ordered to file oppositions or statements of non- opposition to both motions within twenty-one days. ECF No. 41. In the same order, plaintiff was advised that failure to comply with the court’s order to file oppositions or statements of non- oppositions would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Id. On March 27, 2025, this order was returned from plaintiff’s current address as undeliverable. A few days later,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.