Ehlers

(PC) Young v. Ehlers

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 12, 20252:24-cv-00361California4,223 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EDDIE L. YOUNG, No. 2:24-cv-0361 DJC AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER R. EHLERS, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state inmate who filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 without a lawyer. By findings and recommendations filed February 7, 2024, plaintiff was found to have accrued three strikes under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), and the undersigned recommended that plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied and that he be required to pay the filing fees in full because he did not meet the imminent danger exception. ECF No. 5. The findings and recommendations were adopted in full (ECF No. 13), and the file reflects that plaintiff has paid the required fees. I. Statutory Screening of Prisoner Complaints The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against “a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity.” 28 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.