Stewart

(PC) Cortinas v. Stewart

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 12, 20252:24-cv-00130California351 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LARRY WILLIAM CORTINAS, No. 2:24-cv-0130 DAD CKD P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS STEWART, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a Stanislaus County prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 1, 2024, defendant Stewart filed a motion to revoke plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status and a motion to dismiss. On April 1, 2025, plaintiff was granted a second extension of time to file an opposition to the motion. The opposition was due May 1, 2025. Plaintiff was informed that failure to file an opposition would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Plaintiff has not responded to the court’s April 1, 2025, order. For the foregoing reasons, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.