FCI-Herlong

(PC) McCaa v. FCI-Herlong

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 12, 20252:24-cv-01191California598 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CEDRIGUEZ MCCAA, No. 2:24-cv-1191-DAD-CKD P Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

v.

AND

FCI-HERLONG, et al.,

AMENDED FINDINGS &

Defendants. RECOMMENDATIONS

17 Plaintiff is a federal prisoner proceeding in forma pauperis and without counsel with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 7, 2025, the undersigned screened plaintiff’s original complaint filed in this action as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a) and determined plaintiff stated a deliberate indifference claim against defendant Allred and no other claims. (ECF No. 13.) Plaintiff was ordered to notify the court whether plaintiff elected to proceed on the complaint as screened or file an amended complaint. (Id. at 5-7.) Plaintiff did not file an amended complaint and failed to respond to that order within the time granted. Accordingly, on April 9, 2025, the undersigned recommended this action be dismissed without prejudice…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.