(PS) Brittany v. Yolo County Police Department

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 12, 20252:25-cv-00778California631 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHELLA C. ALFARO BRITTANY, No. 2:25-cv-00778-DAD-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING

YOLO COUNTY POLICE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO PROCEED IN DEPARTMENT, et al., FORMA PAUPERIS, AND DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO PAY FILING FEE Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 2, 3)

17 Plaintiff Michella C. Alfaro Brittany proceeds pro se in this civil rights action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 13, 2025, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 2) be denied because plaintiff’s application did not establish that she was unable to pay the required filing fee in full on account of her poverty. (Doc. No. 3.) The magistrate judge found that the application 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.