Ferrara

(HC) Turner v. Ferrara

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 12, 20252:25-cv-00933California1,984 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY RICHARD TURNER, No. 2:25-cv-0933 DC CSK P Petitioner, v. ORDER SHERIFF THOMAS A. FERRARA, Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a county jail inmate proceeding pro se, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis. Examination of the affidavit reveals petitioner is unable to afford the costs of this action. Accordingly, leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). As discussed below, the petition is dismissed with leave to amend, and his recent filing (ECF No. 9) is denied. I. GOVERNING STANDARDS The Court is required to screen all habeas petitions upon filing, and to summarily dismiss “[i]f it plainly appears from the petition and any attached exhibits that the petitioner is not entitled to relief in the district court.” Rule 4, Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. Petitions brought 28 pursuant to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.