Sullivan

(PS) Wu v. Sullivan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 12, 20252:25-cv-00164California421 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ICHI WU, No. 2:25-cv-00164-DC-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

DYLAN SULLIVAN, et al. (Doc. No. 4) Defendants.

16 Plaintiff Ichi Wu is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil action. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On February 13, 2025, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending this action be dismissed without further leave to amend due to this court’s lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (Doc. No. 4.) Specifically, the magistrate judge found Plaintiff’s complaint was barred by the Rooker-Feldman doctrine.1 (Id. at 2–3.) The findings and recommendations were served on Plaintiff and contained notice that any objections thereto were to be filed within fourteen (14) days from the date of service. (Id. at 4.) On February 18, 2025,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.