In re Jose C. CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 13, 2025D083971California172 words

Opinion

Huffman, J.

STATEMENT OF FACTS

The Minor admitted he committed an assault and that he had carried a concealed and loaded firearm.

All statutory references are to the Penal Code unless otherwise specified. 2

DISCUSSION

As we have noted, appellate counsel has filed a Wende brief and asks the court to independently review the record for error. Counsel has also identified several possible issues that were considered in evaluating the potential merits of this appeal. (Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738.) 1. Whether the court abused its discretion in declaring the Minor to be a ward of the court and placing him in the STRTP program. 2. Whether the juvenile court properly calculated the maximum period of confinement. 3. Whether the juvenile court properly determined the maximum period of confinement. We have independently reviewed the record for error as required by Wende and Anders. We have not discovered any arguable issues for reversal on appeal. Competent counsel has represented the Minor on this appeal.

DISPOSITION

The juvenile court’s dispositional order is affirmed.

HUFFMAN, J.

WE CONCUR:

McCONNELL, P. J.

BUCHANAN, J.

3