Nazaryan

Nazaryan v. Femtonmetrix

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 13, 2025G061412MCalifornia6,763 words

Opinion

Opinion

Sanchez, J.

Filed 5/13/25 (unmodified opinion attached)

CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

HOVIK NAZARYAN,

Plaintiff and Appellant, G061412, G062027, G062179,

G062307

v. (Super. Ct. No. 30-2018-00979038) FEMTOMETRIX, INC., et al.,

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION

Defendants and Appellants. AND DENYING REHEARING;

NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT

BRIAN LARZELERE et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

It is ordered that the opinion filed April 23, 2025, be modified as

follows:

On page 26, second sentence, under the disposition section, delete the

following:

“Plaintiff shall recover his costs incurred on appeal.”

And in its place insert the following:

“Plaintiff shall recover his costs incurred on the appeal filed by

FemtoMetrix, Rubin, and Raphael. Rolfes and Larzelere shall recover their

costs incurred on plaintiff’s cross-appeal.” There is no change in the judgment.

The petition filed by defendants Tom Rolfes and Brian Larzelere for

limited rehearing is DENIED.

e 8.1105(b) and 8.1110, this opinion is certified for publication with the exception of parts I, II.B.,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.