In re R.M.
Opinion
Opinion
I.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
After investigating a referral for possible neglect of the children by mother, San
Bernardino County Children and Family Services (CFS) removed the children from
mother’s home and filed petitions in the juvenile court alleging the children were
dependents under section 300.
At the detention hearing, the juvenile court ordered the children detained and
ordered the parents to receive visitation. The court also granted CFS the authority to
provide visits to relatives, “as appropriate.”
In its report for the combined jurisdiction/disposition hearing, CFS recommended
the juvenile court find true the allegations in the petition, detain the children, and order
family reunification services for both parents. Both parents were interviewed and denied
having concerns with themselves while expressing concerns about the children’s safety
with the other parent. Father appeared to be forthcoming about concerns related to his
responsibility for the children’s removal, whereas mother appeared to minimize any
concerns regarding her conduct. Mother identified her parents as her support network.
3 Both children reported they felt safe in mother’s…